Best Naked Bikes

Based on 221 reviews
Brand
Search brand…
Rating
Price
$8,000 to $29,000
Engine Displacement
Learner Approved
Transmission

Honda CB125E

Honda CB125E

4.3 Summary
hitchSouth Australia6 posts
 

Don't believe the knockers – The 125e without a doubt is cheap reliable and fun to ride. At age 64 and living on 20 acres I needed something other than an ag bike which are over… Read more

rated and over priced in my opinion to move sheep around from paddock to paddock.The bike is also ridden to my nearest regional town 300km round trip on a semi regular basis half of that trip is on dirt and goat tracks.The only mods I have done to the bike are change front sprocket from 15 to 16 tooth,this allows the bike to sit on 90ks with top speed 100ks and allows the engine to enjoy being revved out through the gears rather than peaking way to early with the standard front sprocket.I also put on a hybrid set of knobbie tyres as I go through a bit of sandy country at times,and also fitted a loobmans chain oiler as well as running the hotter spark plug recommended by Honda for prolonged high speed riding.Last but not least I fitted a Fumoto quick release oil valve which replaces the sump plug making oil changes a 5 minute job,money well spent,given that I change the oil every 1,000 kilometres. The bike has behaved flawlessly, runs on the smell of an oily rag,and has a good sized tank that gives up to 450ks of riding depending on conditions.Whether you want a cheap commuter or just a bike to have a bit of fun on without breaking the bank the 125e won't disappoint.At the end of the day,you get what you pay for....if your after speed and adrenalin rush...stay away from this bike. Cheers and safe riding to you all.

Yamaha MT-07

Yamaha MT-07

4.7 Summary
Lukey13 posts
 

best mid range naked – Have owned a big litre Yamaha among other bikes and the MT-07 is the best for around town and a squirt through the hills, sounds good too with an… Read more

Akro. A lot of comments about handling on the earlier models, mine is the 2019 model and the handling is good. Good narrow bike for lane splitting, super torquey, economical with still got a lot to offer at highway speeds. Highly recommended and still puts a smile on my face. Surprises bigger bikes off the line with its power to weight and torque, you just have to lean forward.

BobNSW7 posts
 

Street Twin – There was no separate thread for the Bonneville Street Twin so I put my review in here as T 100 was the closest variant. Street Twin 2017: -the… Read more

engine is great for real world speed, excellent torque -low fuel consumption (4.1 with 2 up in and out of urban areas and I need to push it hard to get above this result) -comfort: I am 174 cm so I am very comfortable on the bike. The seat is good and its roomy enough for me. It's good with a passenger as well, but I'm looking into upgrading the shock for that. Taller riders could find this bike cramped on longer trips, but its compact character makes it an excellent city bike (and its torque, of course) -reliability: I bought it with 14000 kms and it has 20000 now there were absolutely no issues just general maintenance -on longer trips: I don't mind the wind. The comfort is adequate. The bar vibrates quite a bit at higher speeds especially with two up so I will put on some bar end weights -style: even if it is the entry level bonnie I never had to talk this much about my bike before... it's beautiful. I also have the Vince n Haines exhaust on it, which is right in the sweet spot for me: great sound, cars can hear me, but it's not to intrusive -tyres: forget the Pirelli Phantom. I run Michelin Pilot Actives and they are good. It wasn't easy to find good tyres due to the 18 inch front -services: every 16000 km. I have it serviced more often, it just makes me feel better and safer, but it's good to know that the bike could do with less. This way I don't have to do mathematics 5000 kms after an oil change if I would like to do a couple of thousand km tour, something that you have to do with a bike that needs to be serviced every 6000 kms.

In summary I am very happy with the bike. It feels like a quality bike (we'll see how it's aging). I was always a Honda guy, but I really enjoyed the character of this bike so I bought it and I did not mind it.

Addendum: At 34000 kms the bike still performs without any issues. It is serviced every 6000 kms as usual despite the claimed service interval.

Kawasaki Ninja 650

Kawasaki Ninja 650

4.6 Summary
Peter DQLD10 posts
 

At last found my perfect bike at 79 – Didn't get my licence until I was 72 and started on a Yamaha VStar 950, too big! Then sized down to a Kawasaki 650 Vulcan S. Good for touring but… Read more

wanted something a bit more flexible for tackling the twisties with my mates. From there to a Yamaha MT03. Loved it ! great little bike with plenty of get up and go with excellent handling but not so comfortable on long distance touring. At a mates suggestion test drove the Ninja 650 and traded in the MT03 the same day for the 2021 model. Just done 500 klms but already over the moon with the handling in the twisties and cruising at highway speeds. Already convinced that this is the one for me.

CFMOTO 650NK

CFMOTO 650NK

3.7 Summary
Steve J.QLD4 posts
 

Comparative BEST value for money LAMS bike – Bought the SP version of the 650NK. Great LAMS bike or 2nd bike if you have Open licence. The Juan brakes are excellent. Love the ride position… Read more

similar to my KTM 690. Goes and handles really well. Glad I bought this instead of more expensive options.

Kawasaki W800

Kawasaki W800

4.5 Summary
robynsy554 posts
 

It does not fail in any area and delivers in all – Kawasaki delivers on it's intended purpose, a modern golden oldie. The closest comparison probably an 850 Norton. Handling is solid and good enough.… Read more

Performance is as expected but with more low rpm torque than expected. Brakes. Progressive with good feel and power. Riding position near perfect (pegs 25mm forward ) Seat comfort very good even after 5 hours riding. Vibrations, well probably best described as pulsations. No numb fingers. Headlight good in spread and range. Love the twin analogue instruments. If one wanted to be picky, the rear shocks could have more damping, compressive & rebound, but ARE not an issue. For the market/owner Kawasaki targeted, they have in my opinion "nailed" it. If your used to sports/cruiser/adventure bikes this will be different. Just a nice, nice, machine.

Yamaha MT-03

Yamaha MT-03

4.7 Summary
RikVIC
 

Needs to be reved – Small bikes are fun. But I always want a bit more power. The Duke 390 was the most powerful bike out of the two, (MT03). I sold the Duke because the… Read more

suspension was set up for the road only. Could not do dirt roads. So I got an MT 07. The suspension on the MT03 is terrible like the MT07, but they both can go on dirt roads. I have seen others take the Duke on dirt online. Perhaps I was too precious with it. I bought the Duke new. I bought the MT03 second hand. The plastics are cheap on the MT03. Thin, and screw tabs break easily.

BMW R 1200 R

BMW R 1200 R

5.0 Summary
Glenn H.NSW3 posts
 

Excellent Roadster – Absolutely outstanding motorcycle with heaps of low down torque and enough HP to keep you smiling. Handling is a breeze with the low centre of… Read more

gravity allowing easy carving through tight twisties or fast sweeping curves. Lots of electronic aids just tick all the boxes when ordering especially the quick shift assist option it's so much fun! No regrets with my 2016 BMW R1200R purchase...love i.

Fitzy17 posts
 

torque, style and a fuel eater – Had my z1000 2012 model now for 3 years. The same motor as the ZX10R but tuned for torque, this bike is an animal. I am 78 kg and thought the bike is… Read more

240kg the design means it is not heavy at all. the seat height is low and the bars are comfortable enough to ride all day.

JohnNSW
 

Sachs Madass pros and cons – You may find many complaints on this bike in many forums. Is this bike terrible? My answer is: No I have ever owned this bike since I bought the… Read more

first one few years ago. I then bought second and now I got my third one. Therefore I am quite familiar with this bike. When I got my first Sachs Madass 125, I spent a lot of money to fix the bike as the previous owner didn't keep it well. What I can share with you about this bike is in the following.

In my opinion, this bike has simple mechanism and it means that it won't get you big trouble. The point is you need to know the bike and I suggest that you need to custom a bit by yourself. This bike is operated by the air cooled system with an airbox. Many people complaint the power as the maximum speed is around 80 or 90 km/h. The normal speed is 70. To improve the performance, you can change the airbox into a carburetor with an air filter. Or even you can get the oil cooled lifan engine to upgrade the capacity. The original engine is one cylinder 4 stroke petrol engine. The original bike has small and weak indicators so I suggest you should change all of them. It is very easy to change the front indicators. Just get a new one and plug in the cable. However, for the rear one you need to do the wiring under the seat. This bike can be used as a dirt bike if you change the tyres and the carburetor intake. It is recommended that you change the lever both in the front brake lever and the clutch lever as the original steel is poor. However the body and the main frame are very strong. You may also change the switch control unit as well, but you need to get the exact same cable connected with the power source. I firmly suggest that you get mechanic to tune the carburetor and the clutch play for you if you don't know how to make it. A proper balance of airflow and oil in carburetor won't get you any trouble of starting and it contributes to running smoothly. Adjust the spring preload of the shock absorber if you find that it is too high for you. Since this bike can be used as dirt bike so the seat height is a bit higher than other small bike. Get a new fuel tap as the cap of the original one is easy to break down and causes leaking! Highly recommend to use the viscosity grade SAE 15W/40 engine oil for this bike. Change some good quality stainless bolts and nuts by yourself. You can get them from Bunnings. Only use the battery of 12v6AhMF and the spark of NGK CR7 HSA. The generator is 12v150w. Make sure you clean the oil foam air filter if you have the original airbox. Check the clutch seal and front fork seals regularly. If you make all of these, this bike is perfect and reliable. People complaint because they don't really know this bike. I found that this bike is simple and it is quite handy. The fuel consumption is very low of the original engine. Better to get 125cc or upgrade it to 140 above. 50cc is too low for this bike as it has a normal dimensions with 1840mm and 760mm together with 100kg. All in all, this Sachs Madass 125 is fun with dual-sports. There won't be any issues if you follow the above recommendations.

Honda CMX 500

Honda CMX 500

4.0 Summary
SewbieQLD
 

Great bike, but a lot of people are posting misinformation so I feel the need to clear things up – This is the 2nd cmx500 I've owned (2021) my previous one was 2017, and though there are differences I'm mostly here to highlight the misinformation… Read more

posted by others above.

But first off... this bike seems to be promoted as many things: A veteran's bike, a beginner's bike, a lady's bike, a short person's bike... but this to me is just marketing, other than for experienced/ veteran riders, all the other segments are market opportunities for businesses to expand their market share amongst people who are trying to figure out their bike identity (I.e. am I a sport rider/ cruiser/ naked?). The reality is, that this bike is unique for having a cruiser look, while basically being a naked bike. While it's annoying to me, the effectiveness of this marketing and the popularity of these street fighter/ hybrid-cruisier/ neo-cafe-racer (or whatever marketing spin they're pumping out to create a new sub-genre of bike) makes this bike quite sought after, and the second hand market prices retain better than say a cb500x or cbr500r. What this means is that the bike is a little on the expensive side due to demand, despite being a naked bike with basic components (keep in mind that as of time of writing, global supply chain issues mean the bike is on backorder for several months (in Australia (not speaking for other parts of the world with their own unique supply chain issues)).

Tom, the guy comparing this bike to a cb125 (which I've also owned; excellent bike especially if you want to do all your own maintenance/repairs (truly great learner bike, which I'd recommend for Alex so that he gains the confidence to lift the bike off the stand)), seems to have ridden a modified version of the cmx, as he complains about lean angle (this bike performs much better in this regard than virtually every other cruiser on market), and also the riding position (he claims his feet are splayed forward, which makes me think he must've modified as the cmx500 riding position is upright... ), if he can't lean in an upright position, it's probably a problem with his back/ balance, rather than the motorcycle, as the upright position... is actually probably the easiest for standing on pegs/ balancing left/ right... but obviously the guy must've modified his cmx, as what he's talking about is clearly not the stock model (he also complains about lean angle being too little for a LAMs bike, also suggests he might have lowered the foot peg, as the clearance is not that great, but also not as bad as he claims (on a stock version, obviously not the bike he's reviewing)). Though, the other things he mentions are generally true (i.e. the bike uses pretty basic parts, nothing fancy in terms of spec sheet, and the suspension being subpar, and the wheels being of a high-endurance type rather than a track performance type), he seems generally biased against the bike, so I felt it was important to point out the inaccuracies, particularly in terms of the riding position, which again, he seems to be talking about a different bike.

Also another person mentioned that the suspension travel is only 15mm... that's only 1.5 cm.... so completely false information. A quick look online suggests that pre-2020 this bike's travel suspension is (front: 121mm, and rear: 96mm).. if their suspension travel is truly only 1.5cm... I think that's a warranty issue they should look into that.

Finally, my two cents, is that this is a great urban bike with a cruiser-look, particularly in countries like Australia that allow lane-filtering (riding in between cars at low speeds). The bike is small, narrow, and powerful enough for anything from dense urban to open country. The weight is actually much closer to a supersport than a cruiser bike, and many professional commentators emphasize the excellent lean angle combined with agility that allows for quick, confident, and accurate turns.

The down-side has to be the suspensions. The post-2020 version I have has harder rear suspensions (which improves stability around corners on uneven roads, but the trade-off is that it is a bit jarring over poorly-maintained roads). Pre-2020 the rear suspension felt super-bouncy, which was slightly more comfortable, but a little threatening when you hit a bump during a sharp turn. That's my personal opinion, but according to professional commentators, the brakes are what's apparently subpar. I found it to be sufficient, (I don't ride that hard) but I suppose it could be dangerous if you're expecting a strong bite from the front brakes and you enter a corner hotter than you anticipated.

And one last word about value... as compared to the market value of motorcycles in general (a lot of bike prices have been going up, or holding higher than traditional expectations) this bike is decent value for money. But when considering how profitable this bike is for the company, and how it is very no-frills, I believe they could have priced it even lower. Though the components are all high-quality and Honda-reliable, they aren't anything special or performance. That being said, modern bikes are all generally good to the point that it's very easy to reach illegal speeds if you're not paying attention. As reference, when I go from a stop light, most cars are about 100m behind by the time I reach 60kph (while using very little fuel on my end)

KTM 390 Duke

KTM 390 Duke

4.2 Summary
  • Thumbnail
  • Thumbnail
  • Thumbnail
  • See allThumbnail
kenrubeliNSW7 posts
 

Simply outstanding – UPDATED REVIEW I bought my 2020 390 Duke new (in July 2021) and have now ridden it 15,000kms in all circumstances from freeway running to rough and… Read more

rocky fire trails. It was a step up for me from a 200 Duke that I rode for 20,000 kms and thought was a brilliant little machine. I sold that, and a 1992 Honda Dominator I used as a touring bike, and chose the 390 Duke as my one-bike-only: a cheap-to-run, agile machine that's fun for short trips, but also a bike comfortable and long-legged enough to be able to handle an interstate trip. The 390 Duke fits those roles very well indeed. And it fits me perfectly - I'm 174cm tall and 65kg. It also fits my budget - at around $7500 on the road it is astonishingly good value. The 390 Duke has a 373cc high-compression engine that has LOTS of power if ever you get up past 6500rpm or so. Mostly I'm riding at 6500 or lower at or near the speed limit on country roads where it performs admirably and returns fuel figures around 3.6 litres per 100km. Push it hard and you'll use significantly more than that, obviously - so mostly I don't. It is a fabulous bike on a winding road, stable over bumpy corners, with slick gear changing (it doesn't need the clutch up in 3,4,5,6....) and powerful brakes (with ABS). Of particular appeal to me is its light weight: it feels highly responsive to the tiniest inputs, yet secure and steady at speed. In the shed, or parking, its so easy to move around. The seat is comfortable for two hours or more when touring. My daughter doesn't take up a lot of space, and assures me that for her the pillion seat is fine for extended trips. There's no screen (but KTM offer an after-market one at a not-unreasonable price) and there's a bit of pressure on the chest at 120 on the freeway - but it's quite tolerable. Night travelling is easy, with classy all-round LED lighting - the headlight is literally brilliant. I've added rear pannier frames so I can tie stuff on when touring. And bar-end mirrors. And a KTM tankbag. Instrumentation is the sort of high-tech offering that comes with expensive bikes - a TFT display with a switch panel that lets you choose from umpteen options. Once you've been through the twenty pages or so in the instruction book you can make sense of it, and appreciate all the on-board monitoring that the tiny computer is doing for you. Clever stuff. And the looks? Orange/white/black in a scheme that's dramatic and just short of outrageous. I absolutely love it. People come up and talk to me about it when it's parked. It is such a hooligan design, the whole bike. It has a unique feel about it. You have to test-ride one to understand. Summed up, the 390 Duke is a five-star package with more than a little milky-way magic about it. Now 15000 kms and no problems. Carries camping gear on long trips, ten hours in the saddle quite comfortable, outstanding highway overtaking power when dropped to fifth gear, 300 km between refuels. Servicing at dealership is around $250. It’s light on tyres and all-round cheap to run. It might be a ‘learner bike’ but in performance and compact character it makes most bikes outside the learner class seem to me like wasteful excess. Thanks KTM – there’s no better value for money than the 390 Duke. And its woo-hoo! looks are a work of art.

Suzuki GSX-8S

Suzuki GSX-8S

4.6 Summary
Bob.QLD33 posts
 

2023 Suzuki GSX8S -3,000 Kilometers – Hi All, Thanks for reading my review of my bike, which I have now sold and I'm continuing to the 8R faired… Read more

version soon. It's a excellent bike, but has only one real drawback which is suspension related. It's too hard at both ends of the bike for my riding weight of 93KG on our poorly surfaced Qld Roads. Well, it's not going to rattle your fillings out, but it doesn't need to be racetrack firm in my opinion.

The suspension, front and rear, is mostly non adjustable at all. No front preloads or rebound adjustments, only rear shock preload, BUT Suzuki no longer provide the adjusting spanner. They tell you to see a Dealer or buy your own (part number supplied). The front end bounces off sharp ridges followed by the rear end. But this gives sharp sports bike like handling on the occasion when you can use it.

The motor is a good one, it doesn't excessively vibrate, there's a little in the Riders foot pegs, but the state of your boot soles (softness) will be the deciding factor in how you feel it. Fuel, being 95 Octane, is fairly economical, and a lot better than a 4 cyl GSX-S1000. Around 4 L/100 KM is the average of what I got.

Seat comfort is OK, and not having the Rider hard against the tank is a good feature. No idea what the lights are in the dark, not part of my riding. Tyres were hardly worn at 3,000 KM, being the stock Dunlop SportsMax 2 fitting, and good in the driving rain showers too that I couldn't avoid.

The quick Shifter action was not the best that I have used with other brands. It was preferable to just use the tried and true methods, and not try to down change while the transmission is under heavy load.

All up, for mid level Rider bike, Suzuki has spun a lot of good engineering with a very fair price. You'll enjoy it as much as I did for sure.

Bob.

Purchased in Jan 2024 at Brisbane Motorcycles.

Mileage: 3,000 km

Kawasaki Z900RS Cafe

Kawasaki Z900RS Cafe

4.6 Summary
denNSW26 posts
 

Excellent bike with some flaws – Recently bought Kawasaki Z900rs 2022/23 Black with red stripes ( non cafe version). Looks amazing. It's has a powerful engine with a retro look. The… Read more

engine loves to rev & bit jerky on low gears. seat is comfy for rider as well as pillion passenger. Only issue I have found is the snappy/jumpy Throttle ( ECU flash might help, however, might void the warranty) and is not cheap to do) Other one is the seat height, I'm 5'8' ..and I'm tipping toeing. might be a problem for shorter riders. Definitely not for Learner riders. * doesn't come with grab rail so sometimes its hard while getting out of parking.

I hope this helps

Torino Aviata

Torino Aviata

5.0 Summary
LucaNSW
 

Great bike! – Bought this bike a year ago from the dealer in Penrith as demo with 400km. At today I did 6500km with no problems at all. Really impressed from the… Read more

twin cylinder, sounds like a 650cc with enough power for overtake and having fun. Really solid bike, just a bit cheaper on washers and bolts ( them started to become rusty after a couple of months) and that’s probably the only complaint I can do it. Really good on fuel (an easy 300 km with les then $15). Overall, if you looking for a small bike, economic, nice to look with the best value in money, this is the bike for you. I can easily assert that is one of the best 250cc cafe racer style on the market!

Yamaha XSR900

Yamaha XSR900

5.0 Summary
RossVIC7 posts
 

Fantastic neo-retro machine – This is my fourth bike and I absolutely love it. The power, the brakes, the suspension, the sound it makes even with the stock exhaust. Nice comfy… Read more

seat, good set of handlebars. This is a fantastic bike out of the box. Really liking the instrument cluster as well for look and functionality. Decent fuel economy as well.

The negatives - terrible stock mirrors (can hardly see anything) and small-ish tank, resulting in a comfortable maximum of around 200 km between fill ups. Coming from a CBR500, where I could do 400 km between fill ups, this feels quite limiting.

All in all - one of the best bikes in that category at the moment. Fantastic price for what you get!

Honda CRF300L

Honda CRF300L

4.4 Summary
Wisey187 posts
 

Better than US edition! – Used to ride the trails on a progression of 4 bikes, finishing up with a Yamaha XT650 back in 1998. Finally sold it too, to get something "safer" - a… Read more

Suzuki Sierra soft top. Debatable which one was actually safer!

Anyway, getting back in after 1/4 of a century's break - with a 1/4 century of maturity added to the mix!! Started very carefully, on a CRF230L - quintessential, bulletproof "returning rider"/learner bike, then added a 250L - heavy, soft, but a lot of fun. Wanted like mad for Honda to "let us have" the legendary XR650L which is almost identical to my all time favourite - the XL600R that I sold to get that XT. "NO" is their answer ... they refuse to import them despite overwhelming demand and suitability to our landscape.

SO, with Suzuki withdrawing their nearly as legendary DR650, leaving only the antiquated 400, and Yamaha withdrawing their WR250 leaving just their insanely overpriced Tenere, and Kawasaki letting their porky KLR slog it out and get bigger and fatter, there wasn't much easy choice.

CRF450L insanely priced with equally insane maintenance requirements meant that when Honda FINALLY released their 300L at a price just north of $9K and a big on-paper improvement over the 250 it superceded, it seemed about the only remaining choice. The reviews were spectacular, so in I jumped.

Wait time was around 4 months, but a bloke cancelled his order and I was next in line ... two months early!!

The reviews say the suspension should be the first thing to chuck out. It hasn't bothered us too much in the 5 months we've owned it. I'm used to the 250L, and my days of doing grand leaps are well passed! The long soft suspension is actually a bonus on the tarmac, although the front can dive a little under hard braking. It is super reliable, the Aussie model by sheer good fortune happens to be the one targetted at greater Asia and scores terrific LED light gear ... our American mates have to suffer the pretty ordinary halogen headlight and bulbous indicators inherited from the 250L!!

Motor breaks in well, fuel economy is astronomical - the computer, which is super accurate shows us averaging over 32Km/L across mostly road, and some belting around the paddock. Many say the tank isn't big enough at 7.8L. There are after market options, or the Rally version of this bike comes with a much bigger tank . So you really must decide what you're hoping to achieve with the bike and choose accordingly. We just have a couple of 1.5 Fuel bottles in Nelson Rigg holders. Perfect.

Apart from the good trip/fuel computer mentioned, there is lots of customisation for the display, and there are 2 different odometer options. Tacho, which can be programmed to momentarily hold the peak on the display - very cool. Easily seen rev limit warning light which can be user programmed too. Gear indicator ... although on the matter of gears it has to be said that sometimes the indicator shows neutral, then when we let out the clutch the bike will suddenly drop into either 1st or 2nd and stall out, so the indicator can't always be relied upon. Sometimes it just can't really decide which gear the bike's in, and displays an utterly useless "-"!!

Good on the road, curves and corners no problems, stock tyres said to be utter crap off road or in the wet. Haven't tried them in the wet yet, and to be fair, they will need to be upgraded if you want to do a lot of offroad. The bike is buffeted around by the wind a bit - it's light in the scheme of things, so you'll feel a headwind or a passing semi. I'm 97Kg suited up, and it's fine at 100Km/hr. Will burst OK to 120, but she's pretty well done at that. To be brutally honest, it's at its most comfortable around 90-95. Another 50cc's would work wonders.

The fuel injection is terrific, starts first time every time in the blistering heat or near zero winter. Throttle can be notchy in 1st, and even 2nd to a certain extent. But you get used to it. Gear spacings good, and 6th can still pull away, despite it being very much an overdrive. First is quite low, and it's pretty easy to just bypass it and start off in second. Fuel cap removal and replacement is a cinch - really groovy system.

Servicing intervals about the best I've ever seen on a dual sport, and you could almost change the oil and filter with your eyes closed! I'm pretty sure it takes the same filter as the 250.

Good on the dirt ... but you'll absolutely need a bashplate - not a lot of protection around the lower sanctum at all. In fact we put a B&B Offroad on the day after we bought the bike, and a set of Barkbuster handguards. There's just enough handlebar space to throw on a quadlock too. Seat pretty well standard fare for the class. 90 minutes or so will see you needing a rest.

Downsides ... the suspension travel is sooooo damned long. It seems like you'll never get your leg over it ... and then it sinks a foot when you finally do. The interplay between kickstand and suspension is such that you will find the stand badly wanting. The bike is unstable at rest on anything other than a firm level surface, or even a slightly uphill one. Don't even try on a soft surface!

If you have limited space in your garage, this interplay can become a pain here too ... the bike likes to really spread out when you park it up, and unless you get your angles just right, you'll find it happily leaning riiiiiight over against your car/boat/wall or whatever. Needs a better designed stand for sure.

Paintwork around your boots is not at all durable. Some blokes fit guards to protect it - we couldn't care less .... matches the 250L!!! Brake lever needs to be a lot wider ... several times I've braked thin air when trying to get it down with the Tech 7's. A really weird experience I've not had before. I've had to develop an unnatural inward thrust of the right foot to make sure it hovers over the pedal in case it's needed unexpectedly. I'm reliably informed it bends like butter too, but it apparently quite happily bends back again too!! The gear lever only just passes. I'm thinking a foray into the aftermarket world may be in order for these two ...

The two selector buttons for the display need ridiculously heavy finger pressure to activate. I mean really silly. You literally have to grasp the display cluster in one hand and wrestle your finger to what feels like the first joint into the button to activate it. This is really unusual for Honda stuff ... but there you go.

Engine note is sort of like an angry buzz ... that matures a little as it breaks in. One youtuber likened it to an angry hornet .... and that's about the most honest description I can think of. Is it good?? Is it bad?? I'll just call it personality!!

It's better than the 250 by a good margin on the tarmac, but doesn't really feel the 7KG it's meant to be lighter on the dirt, in my opinion. Mind you, both it and the 250 are perfect in the dirt ... the 300 just doesn't feel that much lighter despite the on paper figures.

At the end of the day it meets our brief here. It ain't the 650 I reeeeeeally want it to be, but it's honest, reliable, cheap to buy and run, and a miser on the gas. A keeper for now. Until that 650 sneaks under the radar!

John V5 posts
 

Great Bike – I absolutely love this bike! Z125 is by far the best bike for having some great fun riding around. I wouldn't buy any thing else in its category. … Read more

This is only the base model and it still does so much. It's performance was surprisingly fantastic for a base model product. I recommend it to my friends and family.

CFMOTO 300NK ABS

CFMOTO 300NK ABS

2.9 Summary
DaveWA31 posts
 

Loved bike for a short time until problems arose, dealers have kept bike for months on end and when given back still exact problem. Love features but… Read more

can't enjoy riding it with check engine light always flashing. had 3 coils and plugs in 10000k. last dealer Dale Britton motorcycles refused to even look at it now and Falsey claim I was rude to their staff, saying I am not happy they had for 3 months and still the same is factual and not being rude! consider paying a little more and get something with backup that can fix it if something unfortunately goes wrong. Sad because I love the look of bike and it used to go so well. (waterpump, dashboard and now misfire/engine light it has spent as much time in shop as being used). Service guy once even said you get what you pay for, we sell these for people who cant afford a honda :-(

Honda CB300R

Honda CB300R

5.0 Summary
JonnoQLD15 posts
 

What a Cracker of a Motorcycle! – I bought the CB300R as a second bike after reading every review I could find on this model and overthinking it of course. The most comprehensive… Read more

review I read was by Mark Pullen in Britain and that sold me. My comments address some points raised in other reviews after taking delivery of my bike in June and putting 2000km's on it. For perspective I weigh 85kg and 5' 10" tall. Most of the riding I do on the CB is hilly tight cornering on poor road surfaces so handling comfort and suspension are big priorities for me. Those in Queensland familiar with the Mt Mee Road (my back yard) will be familiar with the road conditions - rough.. Seat comfort is fine - I fitted a sheepskin pad (as I do on all my bikes) and have never noticed any discomfort at all after over 2 hours in the saddle. When I rode the bike back from the dealer without sheepie (50 min ride) I did not notice the seat at all - a good sign. The suspension is a standout and when riding over poor road surfaces I can feel the quality of absorption and rebound which is excellent. Full marks to Honda using the Showa Upside-down big piston forks which are truly impressive. The rear suspension compliments the front and I have not altered the rear from stock. Handling is razor sharp with very quick steering and stable in wet and dry with the stock tyres. The gearbox action is one of the smoothest I have had on any bike (if not the smoothest) and selection of 1st (no clunk) and finding neutral faultless. The slipper clutch is super light. The gearbox ratios are very close with 1st being lower than I am used to. Found that you can be in 5th gear at 60kmh and 6th gear at 70kmh without stress then the bike will pull effortlessly to over 100kmh and hold that speed on hills without effort. I had thought that it could do with slightly taller gearing to make highway or open road running a little more relaxed, but have decided otherwise. A reviewer (Da Bin Che) in Asia did upgrade to a 15 tooth front sprocket for a long trip he was doing, and then swapped it back to the standard 14 tooth on his return as he felt that the 15 tooth messed with the power/torque characteristics of the engine on hilly roads meaning frequent gearchanging on hills. With only 286cc to play with I could see his logic and Honda have clearly put thought into the overall ratio's to suit the engine. If you were doing mainly of highway work then maybe the sprocket change would make sense, but otherwise leave it stock is my thought. You do have to get used to those short gearing ratios though. The engine itself is a peach - incredibly smooth at all revs and has torque and good engine braking in all the right places. A gearchange shift indicator light on the dash is fitted, which to me seems to be mainly for the amusement of reviewers or boy racers to look at when they rev the ring out of the engine. I find changing up at around 5000 rpm is absolutely fine and no need for the light which shows at 8000rpm. Showing my age maybe.. The CB300 will be fine for touring as long as you adjust your expectations with how much you carry and ideally not with an adult pillion as it is a short wheel base and things could be a bit cosy seating wise. As I mentioned, it will hold 100kmh plus easily and you will not have the anxiety of that falling back to 80kmh at the sight of a hill with traffic on your tail. I have fitted a Givi 30L top box which is perfect for general duties - there are a lot of luggage options available for the CB300R. Fuel Tank: There has been comment that the 10.1L fuel tank is too small and a limiting factor. Not so. I have regularly achieved a range of 250km from the tank showing 1 bar fuel remaining only to find on refilling that there was 2.84L left in the tank so effective range could be closer to 300km which is excellent. I use 95 RON Fuel and riding is a mixture of open road, hilly terrain and shorter trips. The tank filler set up is not ideal and comment has been made on this by others. There is a bar placed just beneath the filler neck which means you cannot insert the bowser nozzle much below the base of the filler opening. There are two large holes in the baseplate of the filler which helps relieve back pressure when you are refuelling and lets you see when the tank is full. But it means you have to refuel carefully to avoid fuel splashing depending on the characteristics of the bowser pump - not a show stopper but can be a nuisance. The instrument display is excellent day or night and the gearshift indicator a welcome update on the 2019 model. Comment has been made that the Select and set buttons on the left of the display are too stiff and cannot be easily pressed with gloves on. Yes, they are stiff, but I find no real difficulty resetting the trip meters with gloves on at the servo and at this bike's price range you cannot expect these controls mounted on the handlebar switch block as I have on my other VStrom XT. Do not recommend attempting to actuate the buttons when riding because of their location. The full LED lighting is superb and I can attest to night riding effectiveness as well. I have fitted R&G offset rear bobbin adaptors which enable use of my paddock stand for easier chain maintenance (no brackets are fitted by Honda for bobbins) and a Puig short screen to make the front look more "complete" I get do not get any dirty air or much of a wind sock effect at any speed to be fair with or without the screen. Servicing: Basic oil and filter changes are very simple and well within the scope of anyone who can differentiate between a spanner and a screwdriver, although the Owners Manual clearly would like you to go back to the dealer for all maintenance so is less informative than Honda Owners manuals used to be. A reviewer I read grumbled that you had to raise the tank to get to the (maintenance free) battery and yet access to the battery would only be required every 3 years or so, however the air cleaner is easily accessible under the front seat which you will need access to much more frequently.. Honda have also provided an easily accessible top up reservoir for the coolant complete with dip stick for coolant level - nice touch and shows how much thought Honda puts into the little things. Service Intervals: Honda claim a 12000km service intervals for the CB300 which I find baffling to put it politely on this engine. The oil Honda recommends is their standard mineral 10W-30 grade - nothing special and yet journo's extoll the virtues of this as a great cost saving measure. The sump holds only 1.5L oil and the genuine Honda oil filter costs less than $9.00. To my knowledge, there has not been a dramatic change in engine or oil design in recent times to feel comfortable about having extended 12,000 km service intervals, let alone using a mineral oil. My Suzuki VStrom XT has 6000km service intervals on full synthetic oil and I think this is more realistic. Honda is not the only bike manufacture to start specifying extended service intervals presumably to "save" the owner money in running costs - but I think is just false economy if you intend on keeping the bike past its warranty period and care about engine longevity. I will be doing 6000km or 6 month service intervals on my CB and have peace of mind. Conclusion: Apart from the fueling up issue and Honda's silly design of reversing the Horn and blinker switches to usual set up on the switchblock I think that this is a brilliant, well thought out bike and finish is typical Honda quality which shows throughout. It is a bike that really shows that you do not need big capacity to do the job well and I have no difficulty in keeping with my group riders unless the speeds get silly - just a terrific all rounder that will suit new and seasoned older riders very well indeed. Will put a smile on your dial with every ride. Highly recommended.

JonnoQLD15 posts
 

A charming bike that is well built, easily maintained and a pleasure to ride – There are a number of reviews of the 350 Classic available with full specifications and one by H.Sam is a good starting point for owner reviews. Mine… Read more

is identical to H Sams in the walnut colour which with the tan seat really looks the part.

I have had mine for nearly 2 months now and done just over 2000km's so it is officially "run in" and no problems whatsoever. My thoughts:

Running In: I had concerns about the 60 kmh speed limit for the first 500km - just not practical for the 100kmh roads around me. The Dealer (who has been selling RE's for many years) advised simply be sensible and use the gearbox and avoid 100 kmh freeways and don't run at constant speeds for any period. Good advice. I was able to happily reach 80 kmh in 5th gear, constantly varying speed and not lugging or stressing the engine.

Result: bike has minimal vibrations and mirrors stay clear at all speeds now up to 100kmh for short stretches. It really is smooth and no complaints after 2 hours constant in the saddle.

Handling: A test ride does not do this bike justice. The handling down a long twisty road with bumps mid corner etc is truly superb and whilst the suspension may be basic - it is does not let the bike become upset on mid corner bumps. The tyres are quite a surprise and grip is confidence inspiring (in the dry) so the bike goes exactly where you point it. Have not ridden in the rain yet.

Seat Comfort: I find the seat totally adequate and after 2 hours not experienced "numb bum" - this surprised me as one reviewer thought it had the comfort of a wooden plank after 1/2 hour.

Brakes: Adequate is the word - but I have had to do some quick stops in traffic and in fairness, they do the job.

The back drum brake does provide some assistance but is not "modern day" effective. They are OK for the speeds the bike will do.

Lighting and electrics: Have ridden at night a couple of times and headlight is just fine. All the electrical cabling looks neatly shrouded and tidy, including that in the headlight shroud which I siliconed sprayed.

Starts easily (I mainly kick start because you can). Tip for warming up is to allow full choke to start and then hold it back immediately to a half way position (with your index finger between the choke button shroud and the carb body) which drops the revs by half and allows you to regulate the engine revs to warm the engine. This will make sense if you ride one. Indicators, high beam/passing light switch and very loud dual horns are excellent and the horns are much more effective than on many bikes today. Dare I say it, the electrics look, feel and sound almost Japanese in operation, but they are Indian/European I believe.

Performance: Sedate is the word as you would expect, but it brings a new level of enjoyment to tootling along country roads and actually looking at the scenery. Any hills will quickly wash off speed, and the excellent gearbox will get a work out - but the ratios are good - you just have to adapt! In city traffic it easily holds it own - but if you want straight line speed and sitting on 110kmh on a freeway with ease, then look elsewhere - there are plenty of 250cc or under bikes that are faster but the charm? In my case, my other bike is a BM R1150R and that fulfils the long distance higher speed role.

Maintenance : This is a bike that you can easily maintain yourself - hydraulic valve actuation, oil/filter changes and chain cleaning/tensioning etc are all easy and everything is very accessible. I am impressed with the engine having a oil screen filter, plus paper filter and two magnetic drain plug inserts. The total re-design of this engine and gearbox by the manufacturer about 5 years ago has transformed this bike I believe from the "interesting" 1955 engine design prior to

that. The two year warranty and 2 year road side assist indicates the manufacturer has some confidence in the product now.

Why the 350 and not the 500 Classic? 1. The 350 I believe is smoother and simpler (no EFI). 2. Whilst the 500 will have slightly more power and torque, I believe it comes at the expense of increased vibrations. Yes, it would be nice to have a fuel gauge like the 500, but not a show stopper for me. 3. Price - I paid $6400 with 12 months solo registration. The 500 Classic is just over $2000 more. 4. The walnut colour/tan seat believe is only available in the 350 at this stage to my knowledge - but that is personal preference.

Improvements? Have fitted a rear rack with Hepco and Becker bag to cover wine/beer duties etc and a Marlin Clock on the bars. Plus I have replaced some bolts with Stainless Steel hex just for appearance and durability.

I would not bother upgrading the exhaust or any other improvements for possibly slightly more performance.

It so far as been a good, honest bike that will bring a smile to your dial just looking at it or enjoying the ride.

Honda GB350

Honda GB350

5.0 Summary
$8,097RRP
Richard B.QLD
 

Honda GB350 – My first Honda purchase after owning four Suzuki's. Purchased the Honda,as Suzuki no longer make the TU250X, which suited me very well. The Honda… Read more

suits me perfectly, 350cc with lots of torque, so very flexible in 3rd,4th,and 5th gears.Top,5th gear is almost like an overdrive, so at 100km/h,the engine is only doing 3750rpm.This aspect of the bike has been very well thought out. I like the simplicity of the bike,single air cooled,upright riding position, low seat height,91 octane fuel,15 lire tank,and very economical. Quality, and finish is excellent, and I consider good value for money.

dj10805 posts
 

Best Hyper-Naked Bike in the market – Amazing motorbike. I just love my bike: Yamaha has created the perfect bike for the city, road and track. 160hp ABS is featured as standard CP4,… Read more

4-cylinder crossplane engine

Electronic control technology

Traction Control System (TCS)

QSS

A&S clutch

Upright riding position

It is super powerful, it just want to wheelie but at the same time you still feel in control at all times. I personally love the Fluor colour and design (Japanese style).

Cruise control is ideal for long rides on the highway and the dc power connector is so convenient (you can charge your phone while riding our using it as a GPS.

The bike behaves wonderful in the track too.

The only 2 cons:

breaks could be better (Brembo for example)

gasoline consumption is high in the city 8-9l/100km

Suzuki GSX-8R

Suzuki GSX-8R

4.0 Summary
$14,990RRP
Bob.QLD33 posts
  Verified

2024 Suzuki GSX8R – Early days yet, only a few months traveled since first service. Now at 1800 KM on the clock. I have another 800 Suzuki, the V Strom 800 RE at the… Read more

moment too, and had a 2023 8S of which there is a review on this site. The R is a sportstourer more than a hard on sports bike; buy it for that alone and you will get a bike that does a few more roles than just carve corners.

The torque is centred around 4 to 5000 RPM and it is not a top end power machine like my now departed 2024 First Gen Honda Hornet 750 which the 8R replaced. It is far more comfortable than the Hornet, but that depends on your age and fitness too. The aerodynamics of the fully faired bike make for excellent wind deflection away from the rider. Some bike windscreens just dump all the air into the riders face (my 800RE !). Suzuki has got it right for my 6 foot frame and height, even better if you are more vertically challenged than me.

Suspension is a welcome highlight on the R version. It has Honda owned Showa's at both ends and the benefit is obvious over that fitted to the cheaper 8S. Where the S at the front leaps upwards over ridges, the R just absorbs them and moves on. The rear on the R is just as good. Yes, you still feel the suspension, but it doesn't get upset. No complaints about the Dunlop tyres fitted, they are the same as on the S, but are higher speed rated Z one's.

First service was $265, which included using the Suzuki oil, filter pack which IF used at every service by a Suzuki Dealer, gives 12 months full warranty extra over the standard two years.

Bob.

Honda CL500

Honda CL500

4.0 Summary
Bob.QLD33 posts
 

Honda 2023 CL500, What is good & not so good – I've now had my bike since October 23, and ridden it 2,000 KM to date, so I have a good idea of this bike. As a prelude, I have a lot of experience… Read more

with new bikes, and with several of the Honda 500 series, both the 2022 X and the 2023 Y, I own.

The CL is a so called Scrambler type, but it is a very 'smooth road' type of light use Scrambler. It certainly is not for any serious off road adventuring along rough or hilly trails. But, I does handle slower speed dirt roads and predictable low speed walking trail type of gravel paths. Jumping over logs and grunting out of creek beds is not what Honda had in mind for the CL500.

I use the CL as a road bike, pure and simple. The same duty I asked of the 500X and my 500F variants. Actually, I bought the CL without a test ride. Much thought by me, on how soft the suspension would be. I bought the 500F a few weeks before the CL and found it was not a comfortable bike in regards to ergonomics. I did not not road ride it first before buying (no demo), and quickly found it was a full on Sports, not so comfortable over a longer time.

I wanted from the the 500X Adventure bike, a good handling bike, good suspension and it delivered in spades, but the windscreen buffeting was a minus for me. So when the CL came into our Market, it seemed to fill the compromise of a Naked 500X and a more comfortable 500F in the one package. But, it is not so in parts - it has it's own character.

The CL, is a comfortable bike to spend several hours riding if kept to 80 to 90 KPH. It's flat slab seat, the high handlebars, and lower peg placement, make it a 'wind sock' at the speeds above 90 KPH. If you are skinny and no so tall, you won't have so much surface area to catch the wind than me. I find the seat is comfortable for several hours of riding too. About 3 hours is my limit in one stretch.

Comfort is a relative term. To me it means a good suspension that can absorb ruts, small potholes without transferring a large jolt up my spine. In stock settings, the front is harder than the rear two shock absorbers. The front end of the bike is basically from the Rebel/CMX500 and the rear end shocks are new, but could have come from a scooter.

Those rear shocks are the biggest problem for the CL. Honda fitted a junk suspension from the get go. The stock settings at the rear and the non adjustable front forks, provide a ride that is too soft. Honda chose a spring rate is far too soft for our bumpy roads and pot holed surfaces and there is little of any damping to compensate for hard thumps that come along unexpectedly.

But it's not incurable. The stock setting of position two can be easily raised up. I used position four, and on the highest of five, while more comfortable on rough roads, oversteered the rear tyre in 90 degree traffic lights turn's. More preload on the front and less on the back DO provide a reasonable ride however.

I modified the forks a few days ago with 10mm of more preload, raised the forks 10mm to re level the bike, and used position 3 on the rear to give a much better ride comfort, but that is another story.

Aftermarket rear shocks when they eventually are produced will transform this very budget bike into a better bike. It's a pity Honda did not make the CL500 from the 500X as it's a much better base to start from, but the CL would be a thousand Dollars or so more.

Price reduction was first of mind with the CL. It has no immobliser (HISS) fitted, no adjustable clutch or brake levers fitted as standard. The headlight and speedo instrument is a straight off lift from the Rebel with the front and rear wheels from the 500X. The CL is a parts bin special, which is no bad thing in some ways as it keeps the $$$ cost down.

The speedo cluster is a disappointment. At its brightest illumination setting of 5, it's a bright as glow worms in a cave, but IF the Sun is behind either shoulder, the numerals appear in bright gold. If the sun is overhead or in front of the bike, you lucky to see the actual speed. Time, and other info is very hard to discern. Honda could have used the better speedo head from the Rebel 1100 and it would have been a better outcome. Of course, in the dark it works fine.

In Video Reviews, the volume of the petrol tank comes up as a minus point. I get a bit over 300 KM range which is 9 Litres of 91 grade. Reserve is 2.2 L.

Unfortunately, Honda chose not to fit a yellow warning light when on reserve - you have to watch for the flashing of the first segment of the fuel gauge. But, the display just counts UP from 0.0 in Litre's used once it's begun flashing. IF you don't know reserve is 2.2L to dry, you could well run out out fuel. The fuel tank did not come off the Rebel, the CL has slightly larger capacity of fuel.

The motor is said to be the same as the other 500's. This is probably true, but Honda do not provide in the Owners Handbook or web site, the gear ratio's used, but the CL has the same rear sprockets as the X & F, being 41 tooth. The Rebel has 40 for a higher speed.

I find the CL motor is rather soft in comparison to the X and F. The other two have much better torque than the CL, yet Honda say the CL has been retuned for 1 Newton/Metre more torque and 1 less KW than the X, F and CBR500's. The other two (X/F) will leave the CL in the dust if they had a drag race.

I put that down to the CL having been gifted the Rebels tiny air box to breathe in the air from. I find the CL, once up to speed, does pull more strongly than lower down in the gears, so it's fuel injection mapping is not the same as my other two too.

In conclusion, I think the CL will be better in it's next Generation. Worldwide, it's not been a good seller for Honda, and Honda have a record of discontinuing poor sellers. It should have been given better kit to start with, but remember it was designed in the peak of Covid-19 times of part & chip shortages, so I will cut Honda some slack as they needed some incoming profits in a hurry.

So, do I regret buying this bike ? Yes and no. It fulfills a need in basic transport like commuting, lane splitting is good too. It's just the Honda 500X and the 500F do it better for not so much more.

Bob.

EDIT 12/12/23 I've now clocked up 3, 200km in 59 days with the CL500, and now it is a better bike than when new. The motor has finally freed up a lot just recently and pulls stronger down low than before. The 500F is still more torquey I feel however.

I've experimented with the fork preload to match the rear on position 4 setting. This needed 6 mm added under the fork cap (3 by 35mm OD washers) each fork leg, and now it feels really comfortable over my rutted tarred roads that should have be ripped up and remade 50 years ago ! The distance from the top of the fork cap to the top handlebar yoke has been reduced from 12 to 6 mm. Fuel economy ranged from 2.8 to 3 L/100KM, but you can add 0.5L as the gauge reads optimistically.

The question I asked of myself: So, do I regret buying this bike ? No regret's now, BUT a CL800 with the Honda Transalp motor would be a terrific bike if Honda chose to make it for us.

Benelli TNT 125

Benelli TNT 125

4.0 Summary
BoanergesVIC10 posts
 

Top value tiddler – This bike cost me under $4k on the road. That's half the price of a middling mountain bike! Astonishing ... It is very economical, huge fun, will do… Read more

about 100kph, accelerates fine in traffic, has the same seat height as many road bikes, was surprisingly comfortable on a 200km run, and best of all looks cool. However, it is built to a budget with more than a few cheese fasteners, some pretty sloppy wiring (you can fix this with a few cable ties), and a passenger seat that can just about cope with a heavy hamster. But for the money. it is brilliant - 2 year unlimited km warranty and $316 annual rego. Highly recommended for people not looking to boost a macho ego.

Yamaha MT-10SP

Yamaha MT-10SP

No reviewsSummary
$28,499RRP
$10,990RRP
Buzzin' DozenQLD47 posts
 

INTERCEPTOR 650 TOTAL FRONT BRAKE FAILURE – After 6 Months of ownership the front brake completely failed. Bought this bike for my partner to learn to ride on, as its LAMS Approved, as she… Read more

liked the style and upright position. Riding down a hill the front brake lever could be pulled all the way to the grip with no resistance and just managed to stop the bike by changing gears down and cooking the rear brake for all it was worth. Took it to the local dealer, Ultimate Motorcycles in Nerang Qld, as it seems it somehow missed a brake calliper recall. There was no brake fluid loss or leak and the front brake calliper seems to be jammed and was binding. The dealer came back to us, after having the bike since the 7th Jan, today being the 23Jan to inform that they have bled the brake and all seems fine and we were free to collect the bike to see "How it Goes" ! Considering what happened, and how do we know its not going to happen again, for the dealer to make that comment and see if the brakes fail again is just mind boggling.

If you have a pre 2021 Interceptor 650, for Gods sake get the brakes checked.

The recall I found stated that both callipers had to be changed dues to originals not being anodized causing eventual corrosion and failure. The replacement callipers are anodized, as they should be.

I wrote to Royal Enfield Australia, as there is no other way to make contact [ Red Flag right there ] and no response.

When this is resolved we will sell this ticking time bomb and buy a proper brand with real back up and customer service. Needless to say we will not go back to this dealer.